Tags
Language
Tags
March 2024
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
25 26 27 28 29 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6

UFOs NASA Crop Circles Mars Rover Exopolitics Video Collection

UFOs NASA Crop Circles Mars Rover Exopolitics Video Collection

UFOs NASA Crop Circles Mars Rover Exopolitics Video Collection
59 Hrs | Video: AVC (.mp4) 480x360 | Audio : aac, 44100 Hz, stereo (eng) | 8.89 GB
Genre: eLearning | English

Anyone who is convinced rockets got man to and from the surface of the moon should not dismiss today's show. There seem to be some glaring pieces of evidence which are beyond dispute that cast massive doubt over whether the Apollo technology actually landed on the lunar surface. That is not to say there may be a secret space programme using something other than rockets which has travelled much further. Are we to believe that the rocket technology developed from the 1940's is still the only thing capable of getting a vehicle into space? Were the Apollo and Space Shuttle programmes just something to put on public show while the elite continued anti-gravity development in secret? Mainstream documentaries on such issues do not present the best evidence and are not independently produced therefore cannot be trusted.

In today's show Richard discusses a hypothesis that the Mars exploration rovers currently claimed to be on Mars, never left the Earth. Several landers and rovers have allegedly landed on the surface of Mars starting in 1976 with the Viking mission. Before you dismiss this, we suggest you study all the evidence put forward in the hypothesis. Several photographs which can be found on NASA's own website claiming to be taken from Mars show objects commonly found on the Earth such as an arctic lemming, a lump of wood and a walrus arm bone to name just a few. Andrew Johnson and Douglas Gibson discuss the compelling evidence which could point to one almighty hoax. This programme is continued next week when more evidence will be put forward and discussion as to why it might have been done.